What if a HIPAA covered entity (or business associate) uses a CSP to maintain ePHI without first executing a business associate agreement with that CSP? What if a HIPAA covered entity (or business associate) uses a CSP to maintain ePHI without first executing a business associate agreement with that CSP?
Issued by: Office for Civil Rights (OCR)
What if a HIPAA covered
entity (or business associate) uses a CSP to maintain ePHI without
first executing a business associate agreement with that CSP?
Answer:
If a covered entity (or business associate) uses a CSP to maintain
(e.g., to process or store) electronic protected health information
(ePHI) without entering into a BAA with the CSP, the covered entity (or
business associate) is in violation of the HIPAA Rules. 45 C.F.R
§§164.308(b)(1) and §164.502(e). OCR has entered into a resolution agreement and corrective action plan
with a covered entity that OCR determined stored ePHI of over 3,000
individuals on a cloud-based server without entering into a BAA with the
CSP.[1]
Further, a CSP that meets the definition of a business associate –
that is a CSP that creates, receives, maintains, or transmits PHI on
behalf of a covered entity or another business associate – must comply
with all applicable provisions of the HIPAA Rules, regardless of whether
it has executed a BAA with the entity using its services. See 78 Fed.
Reg. 5565, 5598 (January 25, 2013). OCR recognizes that there may,
however, be circumstances where a CSP may not have actual or
constructive knowledge that a covered entity or another business
associate is using its services to create, receive, maintain, or
transmit ePHI. The HIPAA Rules provide an affirmative defense in cases
where a CSP takes action to correct any non-compliance within 30 days
(or such additional period as OCR may determine appropriate based on the
nature and extent of the non-compliance) of the time that it knew or
should have known of the violation (e.g., at the point the CSP knows or
should have known that a covered entity or business associate customer
is maintaining ePHI in its cloud). 45 CFR 160.410. This affirmative
defense does not, however, apply in cases where the CSP was not aware of
the violation due to its own willful neglect.
If a CSP becomes aware that it is maintaining ePHI, it must come into
compliance with the HIPAA Rules, or securely return the ePHI to the
customer or, if agreed to by the customer, securely destroy the ePHI.
Once the CSP securely returns or destroys the ePHI (subject to
arrangement with the customer), it is no longer a business associate.
We recommend CSPs document these actions.
While a CSP maintains ePHI, the HIPAA Rules prohibit the CSP from
using or disclosing the data in a manner that is inconsistent with the
Rules.
| Hospital Revises Email Distribution as a Result of a Disclosure to Persons Without a "Need to Know" Covered Entity: General Hospital Issue: Impermissible Use and Disclosure A complainant, who was both a patient and an employee of the hospital, alleged that her protected health information (PHI) was impermissibly disclosed to her supervisor. OCR’s investigation revealed that: the hospital distributed an Operating Room (OR) schedule to employees via email; the hospital’s OR schedule contained information about the complainant’s upcoming surgery. While the Privacy Rule may permit the disclosure of an OR schedule containing PHI, in this case, a hospital employee ...read more |
| Health Sciences Center Revises Process to Prevent Unauthorized Disclosures to Employers Covered Entity: General Hospitals Issue: Impermissible Uses and Disclosures; Authorizations A state health sciences center disclosed protected health information to a complainant's employer without authorization. Among other corrective actions to resolve the specific issues in the case, including mitigation of harm to the complainant, OCR required the Center to revise its procedures regarding patient authorization prior to release of protected health information to an employer. All staff was trained on the revised procedures. ...read more |
| Private Practice Revises Access Procedure to Provide Access Despite an Outstanding Balance Covered Entity: Private Practice Issue: Access A complainant alleged that a private practice physician denied her access to her medical records, because the complainant had an outstanding balance for services the physician had provided. During OCR’s investigation, the physician confirmed that the complainant was not given access to her medical record because of the outstanding balance. OCR provided technical assistance to the physician, explaining that, in general, the Privacy Rule requires that a covered entity provide an individual access to their medical record within 30 days of ...read more |
|
July 2026
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
|
Blog Home
Newest Blog Entries
1/21/25 Understanding Business Associate Agreements
11/12/22 Modernizing Medicine Agrees to Pay $45 Million to Resolve Allegations of Accepting and Paying Illegal Kickbacks and Causing False Claims
11/12/22 Indian National Charged in $8 Million COVID-19 Relief Fraud Scheme
11/12/22 Former Hospital Employee Pleads Guilty To Criminal HIPPA Charges
11/12/22 Covered entities and those persons rendered accountable by general principles of corporate criminal liability may be prosecuted directly under 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-6
11/12/22 The Delaware Division of Developmental Disabilities Services Data Breach
11/12/22 OCR Settles Three Cases with Dental Practices for Patient Right of Access under HIPAA
11/12/22 HHS Issues Guidance on HIPAA and Audio-Only Telehealth
11/12/22 Five Former Methodist Hospital Employees Charged with HIPAA Violations
11/12/22 May a covered entity use or disclose protected health information for litigation?
11/12/22 When does the Privacy Rule allow covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials?
Blog Archives
January 2025 (1)
November 2022 (54)
Blog Labels
BAA (4)
EHR Fraud (1)
HIPAA (2)
Covered Entity (40)
PPP Fraud (1)
ePHI (2)
Data Breach (1)
HIPAA Enforcement (3)
Telehealth (1)
|
