May a covered entity use or disclose protected health information for litigation? May a covered entity use or disclose protected health information for litigation?
May a covered entity use or disclose protected health information for litigation?
Answer:
A covered entity may use or disclose protected health information as permitted or required by the Privacy Rule, see 45 CFR 164.502(a)
(PDF); and, subject to certain conditions the Rule typically permits
uses and disclosures for litigation, whether for judicial or
administrative proceedings, under particular provisions for judicial and
administrative proceedings set forth at 45 CFR 164.512(e) (GPO), or as part of the covered entity’s health care operations, 45 CFR 164.506(a) (PDF).
Depending on the context, a covered entity’s use or disclosure of
protected health information in the course of litigation also may be
permitted under a number of other provisions of the Rule, including uses
or disclosures that are:
- required by law (as when the court has ordered certain disclosures),
- for a proceeding before a health oversight agency (as in a contested licensing revocation),
- for payment purposes (as in a collection action on an unpaid claim), or
- with the individual’s written authorization.
Where a covered entity is a party to a legal proceeding, such as
a plaintiff or defendant, the covered entity may use or disclose
protected health information for purposes of the litigation as part of
its health care operations. The definition of “health care operations”
at 45 CFR 164.501
(GPO) includes a covered entity’s activities of conducting or arranging
for legal services to the extent such activities are related to the
covered entity’s covered functions (i.e., those functions that make the
entity a health plan, health care provider, or health care
clearinghouse), including legal services related to an entity’s
treatment or payment functions. Thus, for example, a covered entity that
is a defendant in a malpractice action or a plaintiff in a suit to
obtain payment may use or disclose protected health information for such
litigation as part of its health care operations. The covered entity,
however, must make reasonable efforts to limit such uses and disclosures
to the minimum necessary to accomplish the intended purpose. See 45 CFR 164.502(b) , 164.514(d).
Where the covered entity is not a party to the proceeding, the
covered entity may disclose protected health information for the
litigation in response to a court order, subpoena, discovery request, or
other lawful process, provided the applicable requirements of 45 CFR 164.512(e) (GPO) for disclosures for judicial and administrative proceedings are met.
| Private Practice Revises Policies and Procedures Addressing Activities Preparatory to Research Covered Entity: Private Practice Issue: Impermissible Disclosure-Research A private practice physician who was the principal investigator of a clinical research study disclosed a list of patients and diagnostic codes to a contract research organization to telephone patients for recruitment purposes. The disclosure was not consistent with documents approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The private practice maintained that the disclosure to the contract research organization was permissible as a review preparatory to research. Activities considered “preparatory to research” include: preparing a research protocol; developing a research hypothesis; ...read more |
| Thursday, November 10, 2022 Five Former Methodist Hospital Employees Charged with HIPAA Violations Memphis, TN – A federal grand jury has indicted five former Methodist Hospital Employees for conspiring with Roderick Harvey, 40, to unlawfully disclose patient information in violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, commonly known as “HIPAA.” United States Attorney Kevin G. Ritz announced the indictment today. HIPAA was enacted by Congress in 1996 to create national standards to protect sensitive patient information from being disclosed without a patient’s knowledge or consent. HIPAA’s provisions make it a crime to disclose patient information, ...read more |
| Health Plan Corrects Impermissible Disclosure of PHI through Training, Mitigation, and Sanctions Covered Entity: Health Plans Issue: Impermissible Uses and Disclosures An employee of a major health insurer impermissibly disclosed the protected health information of one of its members without following the insurer's authorization and verification procedures. Among other corrective actions to resolve the specific issues in the case, OCR required the health insurer to train its staff on the applicable policies and procedures and to mitigate the harm to the individual. In addition, the employee who made the disclosure was counseled and given a written warning. ...read more |
| Tuesday, November 1, 2022 Modernizing Medicine Inc. (ModMed), an electronic health record (EHR) technology vendor located in Boca Raton, Florida, has agreed to pay $45 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by accepting and providing unlawful remuneration in exchange for referrals and by causing its users to report inaccurate information in connection with claims for federal incentive payments. The Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits anyone from offering or paying, directly or indirectly, any remuneration — which includes money or any other thing of value — to induce referrals of items or services covered by Medicare, ...read more |
|
April 2026
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
|
Blog Home
Newest Blog Entries
1/21/25 Understanding Business Associate Agreements
11/12/22 Modernizing Medicine Agrees to Pay $45 Million to Resolve Allegations of Accepting and Paying Illegal Kickbacks and Causing False Claims
11/12/22 Indian National Charged in $8 Million COVID-19 Relief Fraud Scheme
11/12/22 Former Hospital Employee Pleads Guilty To Criminal HIPPA Charges
11/12/22 Covered entities and those persons rendered accountable by general principles of corporate criminal liability may be prosecuted directly under 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-6
11/12/22 The Delaware Division of Developmental Disabilities Services Data Breach
11/12/22 OCR Settles Three Cases with Dental Practices for Patient Right of Access under HIPAA
11/12/22 HHS Issues Guidance on HIPAA and Audio-Only Telehealth
11/12/22 Five Former Methodist Hospital Employees Charged with HIPAA Violations
11/12/22 May a covered entity use or disclose protected health information for litigation?
11/12/22 When does the Privacy Rule allow covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials?
Blog Archives
November 2022 (54)
January 2025 (1)
Blog Labels
Telehealth (1)
HIPAA (2)
BAA (4)
HIPAA Enforcement (3)
ePHI (2)
Data Breach (1)
Covered Entity (40)
PPP Fraud (1)
EHR Fraud (1)
|
