If a CSP stores only encrypted ePHI and does not have a decryption key, is it a HIPAA business associate? If a CSP stores only encrypted ePHI and does not have a decryption key, is it a HIPAA business associate?
If a CSP stores only encrypted ePHI and does not have a decryption key, is it a HIPAA business associate?
Answer:
Yes, because the CSP receives and maintains (e.g., to process and/or
store) electronic protected health information (ePHI) for a covered
entity or another business associate. Lacking an encryption key for the
encrypted data it receives and maintains does not exempt a CSP from
business associate status and associated obligations under the HIPAA
Rules. An entity that maintains ePHI on behalf of a covered entity (or
another business associate) is a business associate, even if the entity
cannot actually view the ePHI.[1]
Thus, a CSP that maintains encrypted ePHI on behalf a covered entity
(or another business associate) is a business associate, even if it does
not hold a decryption key[i] and therefore cannot view the information. For convenience purposes this guidance uses the term no-view services
to describe the situation in which the CSP maintains encrypted ePHI on
behalf of a covered entity (or another business associate) without
having access to the decryption key.
While encryption protects ePHI by significantly reducing the risk of
the information being viewed by unauthorized persons, such protections
alone cannot adequately safeguard the confidentiality, integrity, and
availability of ePHI as required by the Security Rule. Encryption does
not maintain the integrity and availability of the ePHI, such as
ensuring that the information is not corrupted by malware, or ensuring
through contingency planning that the data remains available to
authorized persons even during emergency or disaster situations.
Further, encryption does not address other safeguards that are also
important to maintaining confidentiality, such as administrative
safeguards to analyze risks to the ePHI or physical safeguards for
systems and servers that may house the ePHI.
As a business associate, a CSP providing no-view services is not
exempt from any otherwise applicable requirements of the HIPAA Rules.
However, the requirements of the Rules are flexible and scalable to take
into account the no-view nature of the services provided by the CSP.
| Private Practice Revises Process to Provide Access to Records Covered Entity: Private Practices Issue: Access A private practice failed to honor an individual's request for a complete copy of her minor son's medical record. OCR's investigation determined that the private practice had relied on state regulations that permit a covered entity to provide a summary of the record. OCR provided technical assistance to the covered entity, explaining that the Privacy Rule permits a covered entity to provide a summary of patient records rather than the full record only if the requesting individual agrees in advance to such a summary ...read more |
| What is a covered entity’s obligation under the Breach Notification Rule if it transmits an individual’s PHI to a third party designated by the individual in an access request, and the entity discovers the information was breached in transit? This guidance remains in effect only to the extent that it is consistent with the court’s order in Ciox Health, LLC v. Azar, No. 18-cv-0040 (D.D.C. January 23, 2020), which may be found at https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2018cv0040-51. More information about the order is available at https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/court-order-right-of-access/index.html. Any provision within this guidance that has been vacated by the Ciox Health decision is rescinded. ...read more |
| Physician Revises Faxing Procedures to Safeguard PHI Covered Entity: Health Care Provider Issue: Safeguards A doctor's office disclosed a patient's HIV status when the office mistakenly faxed medical records to the patient's place of employment instead of to the patient's new health care provider. The employee responsible for the disclosure received a written disciplinary warning, and both the employee and the physician apologized to the patient. To resolve this matter, OCR also required the practice to revise the office's fax cover page to underscore a confidential communication for the intended recipient. The office informed all its employees of the ...read more |
| No Business Associate Agreement? $31K Mistake The Center for Children’s Digestive Health (CCDH) has paid the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) $31,000 to settle potential violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule and agreed to implement a corrective action plan. CCDH is a small, for-profit health care provider with a pediatric subspecialty practice that operates its practice in seven clinic locations in Illinois. In August 2015, the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) initiated a compliance review of the Center for Children’s Digestive Health (CCDH) following an initiation ...read more |
|
August 2026
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| | | | | | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
Blog Home
Newest Blog Entries
1/21/25 Understanding Business Associate Agreements
11/12/22 Modernizing Medicine Agrees to Pay $45 Million to Resolve Allegations of Accepting and Paying Illegal Kickbacks and Causing False Claims
11/12/22 Indian National Charged in $8 Million COVID-19 Relief Fraud Scheme
11/12/22 Former Hospital Employee Pleads Guilty To Criminal HIPPA Charges
11/12/22 Covered entities and those persons rendered accountable by general principles of corporate criminal liability may be prosecuted directly under 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-6
11/12/22 The Delaware Division of Developmental Disabilities Services Data Breach
11/12/22 OCR Settles Three Cases with Dental Practices for Patient Right of Access under HIPAA
11/12/22 HHS Issues Guidance on HIPAA and Audio-Only Telehealth
11/12/22 Five Former Methodist Hospital Employees Charged with HIPAA Violations
11/12/22 May a covered entity use or disclose protected health information for litigation?
11/12/22 When does the Privacy Rule allow covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials?
Blog Archives
November 2022 (54)
January 2025 (1)
Blog Labels
EHR Fraud (1)
Telehealth (1)
HIPAA Enforcement (3)
PPP Fraud (1)
Data Breach (1)
HIPAA (2)
ePHI (2)
Covered Entity (40)
BAA (4)
|
